Interpreting the 2nd Amendment, as written by the founding fathers must be in context with the rules of grammar back at the turn of the 18th Century.
Daniel webster was a boy, who was schooled in the precise grammar of that time.
Modern "interpretations" made by our liberal Supreme Court are are based upon politics. How can we put up with this?
Daniel Webster 1782-1852, American statesman, lawyer, and orator, b. Salisbury (now in Franklin), N.H. Early Career He graduated (1801) from Dartmouth College, studied law, and, after an interval as a schoolmaster, was admitted (1805) to the bar.
"Laws that
forbid the carrying of arms disarm only those who are neither inclined
nor determined to commit crimes. Such laws make things worse for the
assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage
than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater
confidence than an armed man."
Thomas Jefferson
"We may be tossed upon an ocean
where we can see no land nor, perhaps, the sun and stars. But there is a chart
and a compass for us to study, to consult, and to obey. The chart is the
Constitution."
Daniel Webster